Documented process, stage by stage
Initial Intake & Scope Assessment
The process opens with a structured intake form — standardised across all case records — covering current eating patterns, occupational context, self-reported stress frequency, and relevant food history. No data outside this standardised scope is collected at this stage.
The intake form output is reviewed to determine which of the eight Rafonel response profiles the case is likely to fall within, and which documentation protocol is most appropriate. This determines the structure of the subsequent 21-day field record.
Baseline Period Documentation — 21 Days
The individual completes a daily field log for 21 consecutive days, recording food intake, meal timing, stress event notes (type, estimated intensity, duration), and any deviation from usual eating behaviour. The log format is standardised; only the data varies per case.
No adjustments are recommended during this stage. The baseline must be an accurate record of existing behaviour — not behaviour modified by awareness of observation. Annotation guidance is provided to minimise recording bias in the individual's notes.
Pattern Extraction & Cross-Referencing
Field log entries are reviewed and encoded against the Rafonel cross-reference index: stress type, food category, time-of-day frequency, and deviation magnitude. Each entry is coded individually; no entries are averaged or grouped without documented justification.
Pattern extraction at this stage is descriptive only — what is present in the record, not what it means for calibration. The distinction is maintained formally in the documentation to prevent premature interpretation affecting subsequent analysis stages.
Emotional Hunger Differentiation Assessment
Using the Rafonel identification criteria framework (Revision 04-B), encoded field entries are evaluated for the presence of emotional hunger indicators — specifically, whether food events are correlated with identified stress events rather than elapsed time since last intake or physical indicators of low energy.
Entries that meet the emotional hunger threshold criteria are flagged in the record and form a distinct sub-dataset within the case file. The ratio of emotional-hunger events to total food events is computed and archived as a core case metric.
Archive Comparison & Precedent Review
The case profile generated in stages 01–04 is compared against existing archive records with similar stress-type and food-category profiles. This comparison identifies which precedent patterns are applicable, and what calibration approaches have produced documented outcomes in comparable cases.
Precedent comparison is conducted formally, with applicable archive references cited in the case file. Precedents inform — they do not determine — the calibration design. Each case retains individual-specific parameters that may diverge from precedent expectations.
Calibration Design & Environment Structuring
A calibration plan is produced from the case record: specific adjustments to meal timing, food-environment composition, and stress-response coping behaviours that do not involve food intake. Calibration design is documented with revision numbering; subsequent iterations reference prior versions explicitly.
Rafonel products are nutritional food-supplements registered with the applicable local regulatory authority under food-supplement classification. Products meet compositional and labelling requirements for nutritional supplement categories. We recommend speaking with a qualified wellness or nutrition professional before introducing any supplement to your daily routine, particularly if you have specific dietary requirements.
Implementation Period & Deviation Logging
The calibration plan is implemented over a documented period (typically four to six weeks depending on the service record type). A condensed deviation log continues through this phase — not a full field log, but a structured record of instances where the calibration was not followed and the context of that deviation.
Deviations are recorded without judgement and reviewed at the weekly check-in stage. The deviation pattern often contains as much analytically useful information as the compliance pattern — systematic deviations frequently indicate a calibration mismatch that requires a documented plan revision.
Case Archiving & Record Finalisation
At process completion, all documentation — intake form, field logs, pattern extraction, calibration plan, deviation log, and check-in records — is compiled into a single case file archived under a unique reference code. A summary record is added to the main Rafonel index.
Archived records are held confidentially. Summary data (anonymised, pattern-level only) contributes to the aggregate cross-reference index that informs the precedent review stage of future cases. No individual identifying information is extracted for cross-case use.
How records are maintained
Standardised entry format
All field log entries use a fixed format across all case records. Field labels, coding categories, and entry sequence are identical regardless of the individual case. Format consistency enables cross-case comparison and reduces transcription variance in the archive index.
Version-controlled documentation
Every calibration plan and methodology document carries a revision number in the format XX-N (e.g., REF-V2, Revision 04-B). Prior revisions are retained in the case file. Changes between revisions are noted in a change-log appended to the document, not made silently.
Third-party record review
Pattern extraction and emotional hunger differentiation outputs are subject to periodic independent review against a random sample of archived case records, ensuring that coding standards remain consistent over time and are not drifting relative to the original framework definitions.
Full chain of record
Every observation, pattern assignment, and calibration decision in a case file is traceable to specific field-log entries by date and entry number. No analytical conclusion exists in a case record without a cited documentary source from the primary field log. Traceability is audited at case closure.
Evidence-informed framework
Ingredient profiles in Rafonel guidance materials are selected based on published nutritional research and undergo independent batch verification for quality and labelling accuracy. Framework revisions incorporate current published literature, with each incorporated source cited in the revision change-log.
Individual data protection
Individual case records are held under strict confidentiality. Reference identifiers used in cross-case comparison contain no personal data. Access to identified case records is restricted to the named specialist and documented by an access log. All data handling complies with applicable UK data-protection regulation.
Origin records for reference materials
Reference materials and nutritional information incorporated into Rafonel documentation are sourced from suppliers whose facilities maintain food-grade processing standards. Active ingredients are sourced from documented suppliers, with each batch accompanied by a certificate of composition. Sourcing prioritises suppliers whose facilities maintain food-grade processing standards.
Supplier documentation is archived alongside each production batch record. The origin map — detailing the geographic provenance of primary reference materials — is maintained as an internal archive document, updated with each sourcing revision.
Named-region sourcing preferences are applied where available. The archive records the supplier locale, batch coding sequence, and certificate reference for each material batch incorporated into Rafonel documentation or guidance outputs.
Frequently asked process questions
The working environment
Open a case record
The process begins with a structured intake form, completed ahead of the initial session. Contact the archive to arrange your intake assessment.
Contact the Archive